Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (5) TMI 34

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uring the accounting period in question having sold its fleet of buses along with 24 route permits to Messrs. Jolly Engineers & Contractors Private Limited. This sale was made under an agreement dated January 10, 1973, for a total consideration of Rs. 14,50,000. A sum of Rs. 2,88,475 was credited by the assessee as profit from sale of its vehicles while Rs. 5,00,000 was credited under the head "goodwill" in its profit and loss account. The Income-tax Officer held that there was no sale of "goodwill" and that the entire price realised by the assessee represented the sale price of the buses sold. This order was later upheld in appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal, however, agreed with the assessee and held that the rou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the route permits were capital assets acquired free of cost by the assessee-company and the price realised on their sale was not liable to capital gains ? It was the contention of Mr. Ajay Mittal, appearing for the Revenue, that the sale consideration of Rs. 14.5 lakhs constituted the sale consideration for buses and route permits transferred by the assessee and was thus profit within the purview of section 41(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), and thus exigible to tax, the argument being that the value of the route permits was inherent in the value of the buses. In this behalf, it was further added....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns tax. Both the High Court of Kerala as also that of the Andhra Pradesh have taken a contrary view in CIT v. P. S. N. Motors (P) Ltd. [1989] 180 ITR 345 (Ker) and Addl. CIT v. Ganapathi Raju Jegi, Sanyasi Raju [1979], 119 ITR 715 (AP), respectively, it being held in P. S. N. Motors (P.) Ltd.'s case [1989] 180 ITR 345, 349 that where a person obtains route permit for the first time and then transfers it, such transfer is akin to the transfer of goodwill, a self-generated asset. It would have no cost of acquisition and since no cost of acquisition can be predicated for the route permit obtained for the first time, no tax on capital gains can be levied in respect of the transfer of such route permit, it being observed, "before any capital gai....