<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 34 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22059</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that route permits acquired for the first time should be treated as self-generated assets not subject to capital gains tax. The judgment favored the assessee against the Revenue, aligning with the view of the High Court of Kerala and the Supreme Court. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the sale consideration constituted taxable profit under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the interpretation of the Act and relevant precedents. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 41(2) and capital gains made by the Income-tax Officer was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:27:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 34 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22059</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that route permits acquired for the first time should be treated as self-generated assets not subject to capital gains tax. The judgment favored the assessee against the Revenue, aligning with the view of the High Court of Kerala and the Supreme Court. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the sale consideration constituted taxable profit under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the interpretation of the Act and relevant precedents. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 41(2) and capital gains made by the Income-tax Officer was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>