2020 (4) TMI 468
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ns contained in Exbt-P3, Exbt- P4 appellate orders passed by the 2nd respondent and to explain such reasons of violating natural justice to the petitioner by denying an opportunity of being heard while passing Exbt-P5 modified assessment order for the year 2015-16 in a cryptic manner; (ii) to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Exbt-P5 modified assessment order passed for 2015-16 by 1st respondent arbitrarily refusing to follow procedures to be followed'; OR (iii) to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing 1st respondent to pass orders on Exbt-P7 application for rectification of mistake apparent on the face of record....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion, Dr.Thushara James, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit on the basis of instructions that it appears that the 1st respondent has now already passed orders on Ext.P-7 application, rejecting the plea of the petitioner and orders in that regard will be immediately communicated to the petitioner, without any further delay. 4. Sri.V.Devananda Narasimham, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it is reliably learnt that the petitioner is not been afforded any reasonable opportunity of being heard by the 1st respondent even prior to the present stage of the decision said to have been taken by him on Ext.P-7 and that the petitioner was also not given any opportunity of being he....


TaxTMI