<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 468 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394561</link>
    <description>The writ petition became infructuous after an order was stated to have been passed on the rectification application, so the Court disposed of the petition without adjudicating the main prayer. It directed that the rectification order be communicated to the petitioner and preserved liberty to pursue remedies available in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 468 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394561</link>
      <description>The writ petition became infructuous after an order was stated to have been passed on the rectification application, so the Court disposed of the petition without adjudicating the main prayer. It directed that the rectification order be communicated to the petitioner and preserved liberty to pursue remedies available in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>