Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (4) TMI 264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of Rs. 93,08,807/- as business income and further upholding the disallowance of expenditure of Rs. 2,62,097/- on account of fees paid for increase in capital. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a company and engaged in the business of financial services as NBFC and investing in shares and mutual funds. It filed its return of income on 29.09.2011 declaring total income of Rs. 16,45,48,570/- under normal provision and book profit of Rs. 14,56,29,065/- u/s. 115 JB. The assessee revised its return of income on 27.09.2012 declaring total income of Rs. 14,08,02,104/-. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noted that while computing the income the assessee has not disallowed the expenses incurred on increase i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ions made by the AO. 6. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 7. So far as the disallowance of Rs. 2,62,097/- on account of fees paid for increase in share capital is concerned, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee did not make any argument. Therefore, the ground raised by the assessee on this issue is dismissed. 8. So far as the treatment of short term capital gain of Rs. 93,08,807/- as business income is concerned the Ld. Counsel for the assessee strongly challenged the order of the CIT(A). He submitted that both the lower authorities have erroneously recorded the facts and thereby made the disallowance. He submitted that out of 72 transactions on account of sale of shares 41 transactions h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2007-8 CITA- XVIII accepts Capital gains u/s 45 CIT(A) order attached 7 2006-7 CITA-XVIII, accepts Capital gains u/s 45 CIT(A) order attached Case Law 1    2008-9/ 2010 11 Gyan Enterprises P Ltd - ITA No 4149/2013 and ITA No 6116/2014 9. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee also relied on the decision of the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Gyan Enterprises (P) Ltd. Vs. DCIT and in ITA No.6116/Del/2014 order dated 19.10.2015 in A.Y.2008-09 and 2010-11 respectively. 10. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submitted that the total investments made by the assessee is Rs. 123 crores and holds inventory of about Rs. 11 crores and has not even done sale/ purchase of 5% of the total investment during th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....there is no material to show that shares and security purchased in the year under consideration and classified as investment in books were actually intended to be long term investment. According to him besides sale of shares shown as investment on the first day of the accounting year, the assessee has also traded in quoted shares during the year part of which has been disclosed as business income. The assessee is regularly trading in shares over the years and, therefore, there is no justification for treating the transaction as disposal of investments. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that out of 72 transactions 41 transactions relate to transactions out of opening stock and whatever shares have been purchased during....