Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (2) TMI 604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ow compass, the matter has been taken up for decision even in the absence of the appellant. 3. Heard the Ld.D.R. for the Revenue and perused the records. 4. The appellant had been sanctioned refund as well as interest on the refund as applicable under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant also sought an interest on the interest, which has been rejected by the first appellate authority in the impugned order. The relevant portion of the impugned order at Page 4 in Para 4, is reproduced below : "4. I have gone through the materials on record, the appeal petition and the records of personal hearing. The Commissioner (Appeals) in his Order-in-Appeal dated 25.03.2008 has ordered as under : 'in view of the above, th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Taratala-IV Division vide his Order-in-Original No.R- 72/AC/Tara-IV/Kol-VI/2008 dated 11.06.2008 refunded the interest of Rs. 1,27,340/- only but not the interest on interest. (v) We have also filed the appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise, Appeal Kolkata II for payment of interest on interest, who without going through the various judgements of CESTAT dismissed the appeal vide his order No.04/Kol.VI/2009 dated 27.08.2009. (vi) For that further and in any event and without prejudice to the aforesaid, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Appeal, Kolkata II failed to appreciate that the appellant all along acted bonafide in the matter and there had been no dishonest or willful ....