Tribunal rules no interest on interest in tax refund claims under Section 11BB.

The Tribunal upheld the decision rejecting the appellant's claim for interest on interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Citing the Supreme Court ruling in Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat Vs. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals, the Tribunal emphasized that no provision exists for such payments if the initial interest was paid belatedly. The judgment clarifies the legal stance on interest on interest claims, highlighting the significance of statutory provisions and judicial precedents in determining entitlement to interest on refunds.

---

---

Issues:
1. Entitlement to interest on interest on refund under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis:
The appellant filed an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No.04/Kol.VI/2009 dated 27.08.2009 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Kolkata, seeking interest on the interest amount paid as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's claim for interest on interest was rejected by the first appellate authority, leading to the present appeal. The appellant contended that interest on interest should be paid if the interest on the refund is not paid within the prescribed time limit. The appellant cited various judgments and the order-in-appeal dated 25.03.2008 directing the refund of interest but not interest on interest. The appellant also highlighted the bonafide conduct and absence of dishonesty in its actions. However, the Tribunal referred to the case law Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat Vs. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals, where the Supreme Court held that there is no provision for payment of interest on such interest if the interest itself was paid belatedly. The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's decision, upheld the impugned order rejecting the claim for interest on interest, ruling that the appellant is not entitled to interest on interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

This judgment clarifies the legal position regarding the entitlement to interest on interest on refunds under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal's decision aligns with the Supreme Court's ruling in Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat Vs. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals, emphasizing that there is no provision for payment of interest on such interest if the interest itself was paid belatedly. The Tribunal's analysis focused on the absence of explicit provisions for interest on interest and the applicability of the Supreme Court's decision to the present case, ultimately leading to the rejection of the appellant's claim for interest on interest. The judgment underscores the importance of statutory provisions and judicial precedents in determining the scope of entitlement to interest on refunds, providing clarity on the legal interpretation of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in relation to interest on interest claims.

---