Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 1716

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. ORDER Re: CAN No. 3555 of 2018 : This is an application for restoration. 2. The causes shown in the application are accepted as sufficient. The order of dismissal dated May 16, 2018 is recalled. 3. WP No. 6214(W) of 2018 is restored to its original file and number. 4. CAN No. 3555 of 2018 is allowed. 5. No order as to costs. Re : W.P. No. 6214(W) o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd considered leniently. He draws the attention of the Court to the medical evidence showing the illness of the petitioner. He submits that, the CESTAT ought to have accepted the explanation as sufficient and condoned the delay. According to him, the appeal of the petitioner is meritorious. 11. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner relies upon 1987 (28) E.L.T. 185 (S.C.) (Collector....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l. The general illness does not cover the entire period. The petitioner is a partnership firm. There are more than one person as partners of the firm. The application does not explain why the other partners were inactive in pursuing the appeal. The location of the other partners in different parts of the country may not, by itself, be sufficient explanation. There is nothing on record to suggest t....