https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286146 The application for restoration (CAN No. 3555 of 2018) was accepted, leading to the recall of the order of dismissal dated May 16, 2018. Consequently, WP No. 6214(W) of 2018 was restored to its original file and number. The challenge to the CESTAT order in WP No. 6214(W) of 2018 was dismissed as the Court upheld CESTAT's decision to reject the delay condonation due to the insufficient and general explanation provided for the delay. The Court emphasized the importance of providing plausible explanations for delay condonation and ruled in favor of the CESTAT's decision. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:56:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286146 The application for restoration (CAN No. 3555 of 2018) was accepted, leading to the recall of the order of dismissal dated May 16, 2018. Consequently, WP No. 6214(W) of 2018 was restored to its original file and number. The challenge to the CESTAT order in WP No. 6214(W) of 2018 was dismissed as the Court upheld CESTAT's decision to reject the delay condonation due to the insufficient and general explanation provided for the delay. The Court emphasized the importance of providing plausible explanations for delay condonation and ruled in favor of the CESTAT's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286146