Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (2) TMI 182

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under Section 4 of the said Act as has been done by the appellant. After due process of law, the adjudicating authority held that the appellant has to apply section 4A for valuation of the goods and confirmed the demand raised in the Show Cause Notice along with interest and also imposed penalty. Aggrieved by such order, the appellant is now before the Tribunal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, ld. counsel Ms. Padmavati Patil appeared and argued the matter. She submitted that the issue in the present appeal is whether the shampoos under the brand name "Clinic Plus‟, "Clinic All Clear‟ and "Sunsilk‟ weighing10 ml or less would be assessable to Central Excise duty under section 4 as claimed by the appellant or under sectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd has held as under:- "7.2 A close analysis of the above decisions throws up the following ratios/guidelines for deciding when Section 4A valuation should be adopted. (a) Merely because the goods are specified items under Section 4A(1) that by itself will not be sufficient to assess the value under Section 4A(1). (b) "The following would be factors to include the goods in Section 4A (1) & (2) of the Act : (i) The goods should be excisable goods; (ii) They should be such as are sold in the package‟ (iii) There should be requirement in the SWM Act or the Rules made thereunder or any other law to declare the price of such goods relating to their retail price on the package; ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... sold in numbers, it would not be that they are not sold by weight or volume, when each pouch/sachet contains predetermined quantity by weight/volume. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 10. From the foregoing, the following emerges : (a) The goods in the form of liquid packed in sachets though may be sold in numbers, it cannot be said that they are not being sold by weight or volume as each sachet contains pre-determined quantity of the liquid by weight as well as by volume. (b) The intention of the manufacturer as revealed by details printed on the sachets manufactured by them and the marketing pattern followed by AMWAY indicate that the goods are meant for retail sale to the ultimate consumers. (c) Under the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the appellants submits that identical issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Pidilite Industries Ltd. wherein Fevistick/Gluestick or Prime Stick having weight 5 gms or 8 gms were imported and were not sold on weight basis but on number basis. In that case vide order No. A/973-986/13/CSTB/C.I, dated 2-4-2013, this Tribunal has held that duty is to be paid as per Sec. 4 i.e. transaction value of the impugned goods and the provisions of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 are not applicable and the appellants are not required to pay duty on the basis of MRP. 4. On the other hand, the ld. Addl. Commissioner (AR) for the Revenue reiterated the impugned order and submits that as the goods are imported in numbers t....