Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether shampoo sachets of 10 ml or less, not required to bear MRP under the applicable packaged commodities rules, were assessable under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or under Section 4A of that Act.
Analysis: The valuation scheme under Section 4A applies only where the goods are specified and there is a statutory requirement to declare the retail sale price on the package. Where the goods are otherwise exempt from such declaration under the packaged commodities rules, mere affixation of MRP by the manufacturer does not by itself attract Section 4A. The cited precedent and the Board circular supported the view that, in the absence of a legal requirement to declare MRP, valuation must proceed under Section 4. The sachets in question fell within that category and were not liable to MRP-based assessment.
Conclusion: The assessment under Section 4 was held to be correct and the demand under Section 4A was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 4A valuation is permissible only when the law requires declaration of retail sale price on the package; if no such statutory requirement exists, the goods must be valued under Section 4.