Tribunal rules Section 4 valuation method correct for shampoo packaging, sets aside demand under Section 4A

CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant regarding valuation method for shampoos in packaging above and below 10ml. The Tribunal held that valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 was correct, following precedent from Sarvotham Care Ltd. case and the appellant's own previous case. The demand raised under Section 4A could not be sustained as assessable value determination must be done under Section 4. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed.

---

---

Issues: Determination of assessable value of shampoos in sachets/pouches under Section 4 or 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, engaged in shampoo manufacturing, cleared products in pouches without weight indication. Department alleged assessable value of pouches under Section 4A, issuing a Show Cause Notice for duty demand. Adjudicating authority confirmed duty demand and imposed penalty.

The appellant argued that for sachets weighing 10ml or less, assessable value was determined under Section 4, citing SWMPCR, 1977 exemptions. Legal Metrology Act (Packaged Commodity) Rules 2011 exempted commodities under 10 gms or 10ml from MRP affixing.

Tribunal's earlier decision favored valuation under Section 4, not 4A, for similar case. Current issue revolved around determining assessable value under Section 4 or 4A for shampoo sachets/pouches.

The Tribunal analyzed relevant guidelines from Sarvotham Care Ltd. case, emphasizing factors for Section 4A valuation adoption. Manufacturer's intention and marketing pattern were deemed crucial in assessment.

Considering manufacturer's intent, marketing pattern, and exemption under Rule 34(1)(b) of PC Rules, the Tribunal concluded that assessment under Section 4 was appropriate. Previous Tribunal decision supported setting aside demands under Section 4A and determining assessable value under Section 4.

The impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential reliefs, if applicable.

(Order pronounced in open court on 30.04.2024)

---