2020 (1) TMI 664

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SRI PRADEEP KUMAR J., ADV. FOR SRI HARISH V.S., ADV. RESPONDENT: SRI T.K.VEDAMURTHY, AGA. ORDER The petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.03.2018 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 38(7) read with Sections 72(5) and 36 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 ('Act' for short) for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 and consequential demand notice issued relating to the tax ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 defines 'tax period' as under: "37. Tax period.- The tax period for the purpose of Section 35 shall be as follows, namely.- (1) In the case of registered dealers, other than those dealers opting for payment of tax by way of composition under Section 15, whose total turnover in a year does not exceed twenty-five lakh rupees, shall be a quarter. (2) In the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the tax period or periods that would apply to such dealer. It is incumbent on respondent No.1 - Authority to assess/re-assess the dealer for the tax period or periods which would be a calendar month in the present set of facts. No consolidated assessment on annual basis is justifiable under the scheme of the Act. Hence, on this ground alone, the order impugned deserves to be set aside. Hence, ....