<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 664 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391051</link>
    <description>Assessment under the Karnataka VAT regime must conform to the applicable statutory tax period. Where Rule 37 treats the relevant dealer&#039;s periods as monthly, an annual consolidated best-judgment assessment under section 38(7) is inconsistent with the statutory scheme. The Karnataka High Court held that such a consolidated annual assessment could not be sustained, quashed the assessment order, and remitted the matter to the authority for fresh assessment in accordance with law after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 10:11:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 664 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391051</link>
      <description>Assessment under the Karnataka VAT regime must conform to the applicable statutory tax period. Where Rule 37 treats the relevant dealer&#039;s periods as monthly, an annual consolidated best-judgment assessment under section 38(7) is inconsistent with the statutory scheme. The Karnataka High Court held that such a consolidated annual assessment could not be sustained, quashed the assessment order, and remitted the matter to the authority for fresh assessment in accordance with law after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>