2020 (1) TMI 584
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ral Government Standing Counsel with Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta and and Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr. Aman Rewaria and Ms. Vipasha Mishra, Advs. for R-2 and 3. Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Karan Sachdev and Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advs. for R-4 and 5. O R D E R 1. The petitioner in the present petition is an informer who intimated the relevant authorities of suspected fr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....was again adjudicated by the Adjudicating Authority and disposed of vide Order-in- Original dated 31.10.2013. In appeal, CESTAT vide Final Order dated 02.12.2014, again remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority as no cross-examination had been conducted. The matter has been finally disposed of by the Commissioner, Delhi-II vide its Order-in-Original dated 14.02.2017, imposing a penalty of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ner, Central Excise, Delhi-II for a fare proceedings. Therefore, this Hon'ble court may direct the respondents to review the case again properly and penalize the defaulters as per the rule with heavy cost. 2. The respondents may be directed to pay the remuneration to the petitioner as per central excise rule for providing information." 2. On the last date of hearing, the respondent....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ways received and there was no case where the goods covered by the invoices were not received. The AO also verified the fact that every transaction amongst them was a recorded transaction and the payments were made through banking channel i.e. by way of cheque from the ledger and bank statements. The AO found that the noticee had maintained detailed account of every transaction and payments made b....
TaxTMI