<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390971</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the decision to drop the demand against the company. The witness&#039;s retraction and verification by the Assessing Officer confirmed the transactions&#039; genuineness, leading to the Court finding no merit in the petitioner&#039;s claims. The request for review and remuneration under central excise rules was rejected, as the complaint lacked substantiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390971</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the decision to drop the demand against the company. The witness&#039;s retraction and verification by the Assessing Officer confirmed the transactions&#039; genuineness, leading to the Court finding no merit in the petitioner&#039;s claims. The request for review and remuneration under central excise rules was rejected, as the complaint lacked substantiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>