2017 (8) TMI 1587
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....urt of Karnataka by its order dated 19.06.2014 interdicted the investigation of a criminal proceeding and after a lapse of almost eleven months i.e. on 22.05.2015 made available its reasons for the impugned conclusions. The correctness of the said view has been assailed before us in the present appeal. 2. We have heard the learned Counsels for the parties. 3. A perusal of the order of the High Court released on 21.05.2015 would indicate that the High Court has gone far beyond the contours of its power and jurisdiction Under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure to quash a criminal proceeding, the extent of such jurisdiction having been dealt with by this Court in numerous pronouncements over the last half century. Time and again, it has ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... behalf of the Respondent-accused. 7. On a consideration of the statements of the persons examined in the course of investigation, referred to above, as well as the statements of other such persons examined, findings were recorded by the Enquiry Officer in his report submitted to the High Court which, inter alia, is to the following effect: On 2.3.2013, a complaint was lodged with Nazarbad PS of Mysore City by Eward Joubert Vaningen wherein he was accompanied by Tilly Gifford, Ajit Lobo and Marina Meyn. The then PI, Nazarbad police station Mr. Mohan did not act on the complaint immediately and the same complaint was considered only on 11.3.2013 at 18.45 hours wherein a criminal case was registered vide Nazarbad police station Cr. No. 46/....