https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284551 The Supreme Court held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to stop an investigation or quash criminal proceedings where disputed factual issues remain, including questions about the lodging and authenticity of the FIR. Judicial interference at the investigation stage is warranted only in exceptional circumstances, and contested facts or defence material should not be evaluated at that stage. As the inquiry materials indicated the need for a full investigation, the High Court's order interdicting the investigation was set aside and the investigation was directed to continue in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:28:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284551 The Supreme Court held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to stop an investigation or quash criminal proceedings where disputed factual issues remain, including questions about the lodging and authenticity of the FIR. Judicial interference at the investigation stage is warranted only in exceptional circumstances, and contested facts or defence material should not be evaluated at that stage. As the inquiry materials indicated the need for a full investigation, the High Court's order interdicting the investigation was set aside and the investigation was directed to continue in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284551