2019 (10) TMI 952

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., passed by the Joint Commissioner (Appeals). 2. Heard Sri M.M. Rai, learned counsel for the applicant-assessee and Sri A.C. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for opposite party-revenue. 3. The present revision has been pressed on the following question of law: "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Commercial Tax Tribunal Moradabad was legally justified in allowing the appeal no. 416 of 2007 (2006-07) filed by the Commissioner Trade Tax, U.P., Lucknow without following the directions given by this Hon'ble Court in its judgement dated 11.01.2010? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in observing that the account books produced in observing t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fication, had found that the goods being transported were ready-made woollen garments. Therefore, a conclusion had been drawn that they were not properly accounted for in the account books of the assessee, inasmuch as, the bills in question only disclosed the goods to be hoisery items. Though, the word "hoisery" is nowhere used in any of the bills, yet it is also equally true that the bills do not, in any way, indicate that the goods sold by the assessee were woollen garments. 6. Commonly, woollen garments are separate category of the ready-made garments, therefore, the bills for sale of such garments would in the normal course of business reflect the nature of goods as woollen garments. In any case, other than the mere assertion that the....