<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 952 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387468</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding compliance with the previous court order and proper accounting of goods. The Tribunal&#039;s determination that the goods were not adequately described in the account books was supported by the lack of evidence establishing the nature of the goods. The revision was dismissed as lacking merit, with the Court affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on the available evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 952 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387468</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding compliance with the previous court order and proper accounting of goods. The Tribunal&#039;s determination that the goods were not adequately described in the account books was supported by the lack of evidence establishing the nature of the goods. The revision was dismissed as lacking merit, with the Court affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on the available evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>