Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 1688

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar, vide order dated 17.08.2017. 2. We have heard Mr. P.Veera Reddy, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Mr. D.Prakash Reddy, learned senior counsel for respondent No.1 in C.M.A.Nos.1257 and 1379 of 2017 and Mr. G.Subhash for Mrs. A.Anasuya, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 in C.M.A.No.1380 of 2017 and perused the record. 3. Respondent No.1 filed three Society Original Petitions (SOPs) either alone or along with some others, inter alia for the following relief: "to pass order against the respondents granting mandatory injunction directing respondents No.1 and 2 to adhere to the main objectives of the Society prescribed under the bye-laws and to strictly be in complian....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....law. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, the following provisions apply in the event of any dispute or difference arising among the Parties out of, in connection with or relating to the Agreement (The 'Dispute'). (a) The Dispute shall be deemed to have occurred, when one Party serves on the other Party/ies a notice stating the nature of the Dispute ('Notice of Dispute'). (b) The Parties hereto agree that they will use all reasonable efforts to resolve among themselves, any Disputes between them through negotiations. (c) Any Disputes and differences whatsoever arising between the Owners which could not be resolved by Parties through negotiations, within a period of thirty (30) days from the service of the No....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g) The Parties here by submit to the Arbitrator's award and the award shall be enforceable in any competent court of law" 6. The learned counsel for the appellants argued that the main limb of Clause-19 provides for the resolution of disputes through arbitration arising under the agreement 'among the parties'. Alternatively, he submitted that sub-clause-(e) of Clause-19 of the Agreement, covers the disputes between the owners and the society. Mr. D.Prakash Reddy, learned senior counsel for respondent No.1, opposed the above submission. On a careful analysis of the main limb of Clause 19, it would be evident that it is in two parts. Under the first part, the owners agree that any dispute between them including the dispute relating to t....