https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283114 The court upheld the lower court's decision to dismiss interlocutory applications seeking arbitration between a society and owners, as Clause-19 of the Addendum did not cover disputes between the owner and co-developer. The court emphasized that the disputes were not within the purview of the arbitration clause and found no merit in the appeals. The judgment stressed the importance of accurately interpreting contractual clauses to determine the scope of disputes subject to arbitration. en-us Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Sep 2019 14:18:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283114 The court upheld the lower court's decision to dismiss interlocutory applications seeking arbitration between a society and owners, as Clause-19 of the Addendum did not cover disputes between the owner and co-developer. The court emphasized that the disputes were not within the purview of the arbitration clause and found no merit in the appeals. The judgment stressed the importance of accurately interpreting contractual clauses to determine the scope of disputes subject to arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283114