2000 (1) TMI 1023

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....had submitted before tills Court that the petitioner had made the highest bid for all the items notwithstanding which the respondent Corporation and its functionaries for ulterior motives had accepted the bid of the petitioner for a few items only. On such statement of Mr. Agrawal, this Court had directed the Corporation and its functionaries to file counter-affidavit explaining the reasons for not giving the contract to the petitioner for all the items, and instead gave the contract for the remaining items to persons who had made bid at lower rates. In that view of the matter, learned cousel for the Corporation was directed to file a counter-affidavit which has since been filed. The said order dated 3-12-99 of this Court is set out hereinb....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... without further reference to Bench. Let copy of this order be served on Mr. J. P. Karn, Sr. SCCG. Put up after three weeks." 3. It is manifest 3 from a persual of the counter affidavit as well as the submissions of Mr. Tekriwal, learned counsel for the Corporation, that the petitioner had not made the highest bid for all the times. His tender was accepted for the items for which his bid was the highest, and the contract for the remaining items were given to those of the tenderers who had made the highest offers. Mr. Tekriwal very fairly shows from the chart that there was a nitnor type graphical error with regard to one item which had resulted in a loss of an inconsequential sum of ₹ 20/- to the Corporation. Mr. Tekriwal furthe....