https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282176 The court found that the petitioner's advocate had misled the court, resulting in an erroneous order. The advocate admitted his mistake, apologized, and promised responsible behavior in the future. Despite considering it gross misconduct, the court accepted the advocate's apology and warned him to conduct himself with dignity and responsibility going forward. The court noted the loss incurred by the Corporation due to the petitioner's failure to lift materials, leading to a loss of Rs. 1,85,789. The advocate for the Corporation suggested disciplinary action under various penal code sections, but the court dismissed the petition, imposed costs, and cautioned the advocate to be careful in the future. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:37:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282176 The court found that the petitioner's advocate had misled the court, resulting in an erroneous order. The advocate admitted his mistake, apologized, and promised responsible behavior in the future. Despite considering it gross misconduct, the court accepted the advocate's apology and warned him to conduct himself with dignity and responsibility going forward. The court noted the loss incurred by the Corporation due to the petitioner's failure to lift materials, leading to a loss of Rs. 1,85,789. The advocate for the Corporation suggested disciplinary action under various penal code sections, but the court dismissed the petition, imposed costs, and cautioned the advocate to be careful in the future. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282176