Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 828

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1. The appellant is an auto mobile dealer and also a service station for providing repair and maintenance services of the auto mobiles. They also provide services like (business auxiliary service) BAS/BSS. The appellant is registered with Service Tax department and maintains books of accounts and registers as required, also regularly files ST-3 Returns. For the period under dispute October, 2010....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onate amount towards exempt services and further disallowed CENVAT credit of Rs. 77,325/- for receipt of security service, consultant advice totaling Rs. 7,60,14/-. However, he confirmed the proportionate penalty of equal amount under Rule 15 (3) of CCR. 2. Being aggrieved appellant is before this Tribunal. It is stated that as per the show cause notice it is admitted fact that appellant have mai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y and non-application of extended period of limitation. 3. The Ld. AR relied on the impugned order. Having considered the rival contentions I find that, from the facts alleged in the show cause notice, there is no contumacious conduct on the part of the appellant nor there is any act of suppression of any information from Revenue. Whatever laps has occurred, is due to lack of interpretational ski....