<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 828 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by an automobile dealer and service station, setting aside the penalty imposed for not maintaining separate accounts of CENVAT credit and failure to reverse proportionate credit as required. The Tribunal ruled out contumacious conduct or intentional suppression of information, attributing the lapses to a lack of interpretational skill. The appellant&#039;s compliance with payment and provision of transaction records led to the deletion of the penalty and the non-application of the extended limitation period, emphasizing the importance of proper record-keeping to prevent future disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:58:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=579784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 828 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by an automobile dealer and service station, setting aside the penalty imposed for not maintaining separate accounts of CENVAT credit and failure to reverse proportionate credit as required. The Tribunal ruled out contumacious conduct or intentional suppression of information, attributing the lapses to a lack of interpretational skill. The appellant&#039;s compliance with payment and provision of transaction records led to the deletion of the penalty and the non-application of the extended limitation period, emphasizing the importance of proper record-keeping to prevent future disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>