TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (7) TMI 750
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... assessment year 2004 - 05. 2.The appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law : "1.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in allowing expenditure related to advance given for R&D equipment under Section 35(1)(iv) of the Income Tax Act? 2.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that expenditure on replacement of dies and moulds are to be allowed as current repairs? 3.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled to deduction of entry tax paid under Section 43B without verifying whether such entry tax had been set off against sales tax paid and the treatment g....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... period of one year of installation, the life of the dies and moulds would become obsolete and this was due to high production involved. Thus, replacement of the new dye in the place of old dye would qualify for current repairs under Section 31 of the Act. The Assessing Officer, however, rejected the contention of the assessee and the Assessing Officer pointed out that the assessee was claiming depreciation upto 1999-2000 under Section 32 of the Act and only in the year under consideration, it started claiming deduction under Section 31 of the Act. The Tribunal pointed out that the dies and moulds were not plant and machinery, yet the replacement of dies and moulds were not in the nature of installation of machinery in the factory. Such m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s. Saravana Spinning Mills P.Ltd., reported in (2007) 293 ITR 201 (SC) and in particular to the decision in the case of CIT Vs. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills P.Ltd., reported in (2009) 315 ITR 114 (SC) ......... 31. Applying the ratio of the decision cited above, when we look into the facts of the above cases, it is evident that with regard to the moulds and dies attached to the machinery like press designs specification, moulds and dies are not independent of the plant and machinery, but are parts of the machinery. Once the dies are worn out, the machines cannot turn out the product to the business specifications and this has to be obtained only on a replacement of the dies and moulds, a fact which is not refuted by the revenue. It is no do....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....after referring to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s.Saravana Spinning Mills P.Ltd., reported in (2007) 293 ITR 201, this Court further pointed out to the decision of the Apex Court where it cautioned that all repairs are not current repairs on Section 31(1) of the Act; Section 31(1) of the Act limits the scope of allowability of expenditure as deduction in respect of repairs made to machinery, plant or furniture by restricting it to the concept of "current repairs". Thus, this Court pointed out that what is allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37 of the Act are those expenditure other than one falling for consideration under Sections 30 to 36 of the Act. The Apex Court further pointed out the example that ....