TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (7) TMI 751
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... proposed the following two questions:- (i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was right in upholding the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) directing the AO to work out the cost of acquisition of land at Rs. 99/per sq.mtr. As on 01.04.1981 even though the registered valuer has not given any comparable case of sale instance? (ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was right in dismissing the appeal of the Revenue without considering the assessee's own letter dated 21.04.2014 stating that notice u/s.143(2) was issued to him? 3. With regard to the first question, which has been proposed by the Revenue, the findings recorded by the appellate tr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... assessment proceedings and the value adopted by the registered valuer was Rs. 99/per sq.mt. from the assessment order, it is also discernable that the AO has completely ignore the report of the registered valuer and without any discussion thereon estimated the cost at Rs. 30/per sq.mt. without any reasonable basis and justified reasoning. We are also in agreement with the conclusion drawn by the ld. CIT(A) that the assessee was not confronted by the AO before estimating the cost of acquisition at Rs. 30/per sq.mt. and thus, the AO was not right in estimating the cost of land as on 01.04.1981 at Rs. 30/per sq.mt. without any basis and keeping aside rather ignoring the report of the registered valuer submitted before him during assessment pr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f notice server should have the details of having served or not served the notice. The assessing officer failed to give any reference to any of the above in support of her claim that notice u/s.143(2) of the Act has been issued. On the contrary efforts were made to find references of issuance of notice in the replied submitted by the appellant during the assessing officer. I have gone through the letters of the appellant referred to by the assessing officer in the remand report and is of the opinion that these are of no help to her. I have also gone through the counter comments of the appellant on the remand report of the assessing officer who has reasonably explained that no notice u/s.143(2) of the Act was issued. Moreover,during the a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... In this case, reference has also been made to the following judgments on the issue involved: i) Nesman Farm Pvt. Ltd. ITAT Delhi. ii) ACIT & Anr. Vs. Hotel Blue Moon (2010) 321 ITR 362. iii) CIT Vs. Salman Khan ITA No.508 of 2010. iv) DCIT Vs. M/s. Silver Line ITA No.1809, 1504, 1505 & 1506/ DEL/2013. Keeping in view the above decisions as well as the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered opinion that the present reassessment proceedings are invalid in the eyes of law because the assessing officer has not followed the mandatory procedure of issuing the notice u/s.143(2) of the Act within the time prescribed. Therefore, this ground of appeal of the appellant is allowed. 6. The aforesaid findings ....