2014 (12) TMI 1346

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an ) Sri P. Karthik Ramana, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner has paid 12.5% of the disputed tax towards the pre-deposit as stipulated under the second proviso to Section 31 of the A.P. VAT Act, albeit after the appeal was rejected by the 3rd respondent. While fairly stating that the impugned order of the 3rd respondent, rejecting the petitioner's request for t....