https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281932 A writ petition challenging rejection of an appeal was held not entertainable where the petitioner had paid the 12.5% pre-deposit only after the appeal was already rejected. The HC followed binding Division Bench rulings on the pre-deposit requirement and held that it could not issue an order contrary to that precedent. It also noted that a Supreme Court order passed under Article 142 does not enlarge the High Court's powers or permit departure from binding law. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the impugned rejection of the appeal undisturbed. en-us Tue, 30 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:31:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281932 A writ petition challenging rejection of an appeal was held not entertainable where the petitioner had paid the 12.5% pre-deposit only after the appeal was already rejected. The HC followed binding Division Bench rulings on the pre-deposit requirement and held that it could not issue an order contrary to that precedent. It also noted that a Supreme Court order passed under Article 142 does not enlarge the High Court's powers or permit departure from binding law. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the impugned rejection of the appeal undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 30 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281932