Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 501

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant. Ms. Tamana Alam, Authorised Representative for the Respondent. Rachna Gupta The appellants herein are providing taxable service of renting of immovable property service, however, no service tax registration has been obtained nor any liability in view thereof has been discharged. Resultantly, a show cause notice No. 8500 dated 13.07.2016 was served upon the appellants proposing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the Department. 3. It is submitted w.r.t. the condonation of delay application that the Order of Commissioner (Appeals) was announced on 28.06.2018 but it was communicated to appellant only on 09.10.2018. The impugned Appeal is impressed to be filed within two months of said receipt. Though the Department has denied the same with the mention that Order was dispatched immediately after announce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filed within two months of the Order nor it could be filed before the expiry of another one month. Hence, there is no infirmity in the Order under challenge. 5. After hearing the parties and perusing the records of the Appeal as well as the Order under challenge it is the apparent admission of the appellant that the original Order of 23.03.2017 was received by them on 06.12.2017, i.e. the 91st ....