<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 501 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding it was filed within the permissible time frame, dismissing the condonation application. The appellant&#039;s argument that the appeal was filed within the limitation period was rejected, as it exceeded the 60-day period under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with the statutory period for filing an appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=578848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 501 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding it was filed within the permissible time frame, dismissing the condonation application. The appellant&#039;s argument that the appeal was filed within the limitation period was rejected, as it exceeded the 60-day period under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with the statutory period for filing an appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>