Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (7) TMI 1066

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... officer levying a penalty of ₹ 5 lacs on the appellant under Section 15A(a) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (for short the Act) on account of its failure to provide the necessary information during the course of the investigations. 2. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter called the Board) ordered investigations into the dealings in the scrip of R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in, there was no response from the side of the appellant. Yet another summons was issued on 18th January, 2006 and despite all these summons, the appellant failed to furnish the requisite information. The Board initiated adjudication proceedings under Chapter VIA of the Act. The adjudicating officer issued a show cause notice on 19th September, 2006 which was received by the appellant and time was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f market transactions, a copy of the demat account statement etc. which the appellant deliberately failed to furnish. Such a failure on the part of a market player has to be viewed seriously as it hampers the regulator from carrying on its statutory duty of investigating into the market irregularities. We have perused the impugned order and are satisfied that the appellant has been avoiding to sup....