<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1066 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for failing to provide necessary information during investigations into dealings in a particular company&#039;s scrip under Section 15A(a) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Despite claiming inability due to a raid by income tax authorities, the appellant&#039;s deliberate obstruction of the regulator&#039;s investigative duties was evident. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s behavior obstructive and upheld the penalty, emphasizing the seriousness of non-cooperation with investigations. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 17:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1066 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant for failing to provide necessary information during investigations into dealings in a particular company&#039;s scrip under Section 15A(a) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Despite claiming inability due to a raid by income tax authorities, the appellant&#039;s deliberate obstruction of the regulator&#039;s investigative duties was evident. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s behavior obstructive and upheld the penalty, emphasizing the seriousness of non-cooperation with investigations. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>