Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 470

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....istant Commissioner, Service Tax Cell, Central Excise Pune III. 1.2 Assistant Commissioner has by the said order has held as follows: "(i) I confirm the demand of Rs. 1,93,864/- (rupees One Lakh Ninety Three Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty Four only) under the provisions of Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. (ii) I confirm the demand of interest under section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the amount of service tax demanded. (iii) I impose a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 for failure to file returns as discussed earlier. (iv) I impose penalty under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for failure to pay Service Tax. (v) I do not impose penalty under Section 78 for the reasons discusse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onsideration was a periodical show cause issued in respect of demand of the service tax under the category of Good Transport Agency Service. Assistant Commissioner has in para 16 of his order recorded as follows: "16. I also find that the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals) vide OiA No. PIII/RP/06/2013 dtd. 10.01.2013, on the same issue for earlier period, as relevant and squarely applicable in the instant case. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the transporters had provided the services of Goods Transport Agent and the same is appropriately covered under the taxable service 'Transport of Goods by Road' and as per Rule 2(l)(d)(v) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 the appellant (the notice, in this case) is required to pay service tax as reci....