https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379742 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, regarding the demand of service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal determined that the services provided did not qualify as Goods Transport Agency Service but rather as 'Clearing and Forwarding Agent Service,' based on the activities performed by the transporters. This decision aligned with a previous order by CESTAT Mumbai Bench, leading to the ruling in favor of the appellants. en-us Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2019 08:21:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379742 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, regarding the demand of service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal determined that the services provided did not qualify as Goods Transport Agency Service but rather as 'Clearing and Forwarding Agent Service,' based on the activities performed by the transporters. This decision aligned with a previous order by CESTAT Mumbai Bench, leading to the ruling in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379742