Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (4) TMI 249

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....one and one black and white box file having 216 loose sheets, which were seized as per the Application "... in order to find any incriminating documents/digital evidence/cash necessary for further investigation and attachment of proceeds of crime...." and because the same were "... relevant to investigation..." and "...shall be required to be confronted with the concerned persons during PMLA investigation...". 4. The show-cause notice dated 31.07.2018 issued by the Adjudicating Authority calls upon the Respondent to show the source of income, earning or assets out of which the properties seized have been acquired. It is submitted by the appellant that seized properties are legitimately acquired and are not proceeds of crime and as such do not necessitate retention by the Respondent. 5. The entire basis for the seizure of the goods from the premises of the Appellant is contained in paragraph 13 of the Application which refers to an internal e-mail of people under investigation in the FIR which states that payments by cheque be made to the two travel agents mentioned in the email of the appellant. The only document relied upon in the Application is an email claimed to have been imp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to Mr. R.K. Sharma, Manager (HR) of the Appellant Company, in relation to the following persons:- * Mr. Gagan Dhawan * Mr. Ajay Panchal * Mr. Sunil Yadav * Mr. Sandesara * Mr. Nitin Sandesara * Mr. Chetan Sandesara vi) Mr. R.K. Sharma duly responded to the questions put to him and stated that the Appellant being a travel and tours company had booked air ticket of Mr. Gagan Dhawan and other persons, some of which was subsequently cancelled and reissued. Mr. R.K. Sharma also clarified that Mr. Gagan Dhawan had travelled once on the tickets booked. Mr. R.K. Sharma was asked to appear again on 13.06.2018 at 11:00 A.M. along with the records relating to the aforesaid persons. That Shri R.K. Sharma thereafter attended the office of the Enforcement Directorate on 13.06.2018 and submitted all the records available with the Appellant where the names Gagan Dhawan and Sunil Yadav figured. vii) The respondent then further directed Sh. R.K. Sharma, the authorised representative of the Appellant, to produce all the records on the next date i.e. 22.06.2018 including copies of the tickets issued, itineraries, mode of payment, copies of cheques etc. to the aforesaid persons. Howe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Singh, who is a lawyer by a profession and the patriarch of the family that controls the Appellant Company but does not hold any designation, position, directorship or shareholding in the Appellant Company was questioned at length about the Appellant Company. xii) Nothing was seized from the premises at (e) above whereas the officers of the Respondent took with them various documents and items as set-out in the Seizure memo were seized from the remaining premises. Additionally, seven (7) had disks of the CCTV cameras installed at the premises searched as well as five (5) blank hard discs were wrongfully seized by the Respondent without mentioning the same on Seizure memo. It is pertinent to mention that no back-up of the hard-disks of the CCTV Cameras and of the mobile phone of Mr. Gurucharan Singh was provided although the Appellant purchased and provided the official five (5) blank hard disks for this purpose. It is submitted by the appellant that there is no mention of the said hard drives in the seizure memo. xiii) During the course of questioning pursuant to the summons, Mr. Gurucharan Singh was questioned about various clients and transactions of the Appellant, none of wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....b) break open the lock of any door, box, locker, safe, almirah or other receptacle for exercising the powers conferred by clause (a) where the keys thereof are not available; (c) seize any record or property found as a result of such search; (d) place marks of identification on such record or [property, if required or] make or cause to be made extracts or copies therefrom; (e) make a note or an inventory of such record or property; (f) examine on oath any person, who is found to be in possession or control of any record or property, in respect of all matters relevant for the purposes of any investigation under this Act: [Provided that no search shall be conducted unless, in relation to the scheduled offence, a report has been forwarded to a Magistrate under section 157 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), or a complaint has been filed by a person, authorised to investigate the offence mentioned in the Schedule, before a Magistrate or court for taking cognizance of the scheduled offence, as the case may be, or in cases where such report is not required to be forwarded, a similar report of information received or otherwise has been submitted by an officer au....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this behalf by the Central Government by general or special order, has reason to believe (the reason for such belief to be recorded in writing) that any person has secreted about his person or in anything under his possession, ownership or control, any record or proceeds of crime which may be useful for or relevant to any proceedings under this Act, he may search that person and seize such record or property which may be useful for or relevant to any proceedings under this Act: [Provided that no search of any person shall be made unless, in relation to the scheduled offence, a report has been forwarded to a Magistrate under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), or a complaint has been filed by a person authorised to investigate the offence mentioned in the Schedule, before a Magistrate or court for taking cognizance of the scheduled offence, as the case may be.] (2) The authority, who has been authorised under sub-section (1) shall, immediately after search and seizure, forward a copy of the reasons so recorded along with material in his possession, referred to in that sub-section, to the Adjudicating Authority in a sealed envelope, in the manner, as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the basis of material in his possession, reason to believe (the reason for such belief to be recorded by him in writing) that such property is required to be retained for the purposes of adjudication under section 8, such property may, if seized be retained or if frozen, may continue to remain frozen, for a period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days from the day on which such property was seized or frozen, as the case may be. (2) The officer authorized by the Director shall, immediately after he has passed an order for retention or continuation of freezing of the property for purposes of adjudication under section 8, forward a copy of the order along with the material in his possession, referred to in sub-section (1), to the Adjudicating Authority, in a sealed cover, in the manner as may be prescribed and such Adjudicating Authority shall keep such order and material for such period as may be prescribed. (3) On the expiry of the period specified in sub-section (1), the property shall be returned to the person from whom such property was seized or whose property was ordered to be frozen unless the Adjudicating Authority permits retention or continuation of freezing of suc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(1) of Section 17 provides that the authorised officer has to record the reason to believe in writing. In the such reason to believe, he has also to record the basis of information which is in his possession before conducting the search and seizure. 13. It stipulates that if person concerned has committed any act which constitutes money-laundering, or is in possession of any proceeds of crime involved in money-laundering, or is in possession of any records relating to money-laundering, then any authorised officer can enter and search any building, place, vessel, vehicle or aircraft where that such records or proceeds of crime are kept, who is also empowered to break open the lock of any door, box, locker, safe, almirah or other receptacle where the keys thereof are not available and seize any record or property found as a result of such search, place marks of identification on such record or make or cause to be made extracts or copies therefrom; make a note of an inventory or such record or property and to examine on oath any person who is found to be in possession or control of any record or property, in respect of all matters relevant for the purposes of any investigation. Howe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) of Section 20 mandates that where any property has been seized under Section 17 or Section 18 or frozen under sub-section (1A) of Section17, the officer authorised on the basis of material in his possession has chosen to retain the property for the purposes of adjudication under Section 8, he has to pass as to record the reason to believe in writing for continuation of the same for a period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days from the day the such property was seized or frozen as the case may be. The officer authorised immediately after he has passed the order of retention or continuation of freezing of property for the purpose of adjudication under Section 8, has to forward a copy of the order along with the material in his possession to the Adjudicating Authority in a sealed cover within the meaning of Sub-section (2) of Section 20. Subsection (3) of Section 20 mandates that on the expiry of 180 days, the property shall be returned to the person concerned from whom such property was seized and whose property was ordered to be frozen unless the Adjudicating Authority permits retention or confirmation thereof of such property beyond the said period. 16. It is clear from th....