https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377805 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the attachment order and seizure of goods. The court found non-compliance with statutory obligations under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, regarding the search and seizure, retention of seized items, and prosecution complaint filing timeline. The search and seizure conducted by the Enforcement Directorate were deemed illegal. The court dismissed the respondent's application for retention of documents and ordered the immediate return of seized items to the appellant, with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2019 07:09:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377805 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the attachment order and seizure of goods. The court found non-compliance with statutory obligations under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, regarding the search and seizure, retention of seized items, and prosecution complaint filing timeline. The search and seizure conducted by the Enforcement Directorate were deemed illegal. The court dismissed the respondent's application for retention of documents and ordered the immediate return of seized items to the appellant, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377805