2019 (4) TMI 147
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eeking all consequential reliefs. 2. The petitioners are claiming to be the consignee and transporter of the goods in question. It is the contention of the petitioners that the respondent has detained the goods and vehicle illegally for more than a month, in violation of the procedure prescribed by the Government of India through Circulars and confiscated the goods and vehicle without there being any order of confiscation or there being arrears of tax and penalty. 3. The petitioners submit that one M/s Manish Enterprises sold 230 bags of Areca nut consisting of 16,100 kgs to petitioner No.1. The said transaction suffered IGST. Respondent intercepted the vehicle carrying the said goods on 4.12.2018 at 10.30 p.m. at Chennagiri near Tara....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssment, re-assessment, adjudication, review, revision, appeal, rectification, notice, summons or other proceedings are in substance and effect, in conformity with or according to intents, purposes and requirements of the Act or any existing law. Any mistake committed in the order would not be invalid in terms of Section 160 of the CGST Act. 5. It is also submitted that on enquiry, it was noticed that the consignor was indulged in bill trading activities. Issuing tax invoices without there being any supply of goods is an offence falling under Section 122 (ii) of the CGST/KGST Act, 2017. Construing the confiscation order as the penalty order, the writ petitions require to be dismissed. 6. I have carefully considered the submissions of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ty equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed: Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods. (2) The provisions of sub-section (6) of section 67 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for detention and seizure of goods and conveyances. (3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyances shall issue a notice specifying the tax and penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order for payment of tax and penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c). (4) No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under sub-section (3) without giving the person c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder unless the owner of the conveyance proves that it was so used without the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself, his agent, if any, and the person in charge of the conveyance, then, all such goods or conveyances shall be liable to confiscation and the person shall be liable to penalty under section 122. (2) Whenever confiscation of any goods or conveyance is authorised by this Act, the officer adjudging it shall give to the owner of the goods an option to pay in lieu of confiscation, such fine as the said officer thinks fit: Provided that......... 8. The Circular instructions issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue, Central Board....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r where owner of the goods does not come forward to make payment of tax and penalty as applicable under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of the said section, the proper officer shall, after the amount of tax and penalty has been paid in accordance with the provisions of the CGST Act and CGST Rules, release the goods and conveyance by an order in Form GST MOV- 05. Further the order in form GST MOV-09 shall be uploaded on the common portal and the demand accruing from the proceedings shall be added in the electronic liability register and the payment made shall be credited to such electronic cash ledger or credit ledger of the concerned person in accordance with the provisions of Section 49 of the CGST Act. 9. In terms of clause (j), where an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o treat the said impugned order as an order of penalty cannot be countenanced for the reason that it is not mere wrong quotation of provisions of law in passing the order impugned but the procedure prescribed is disturbed. It is well settled law that unless the tax and penalty are quantified, no confiscation order could be passed. It is necessary to provide an opportunity to the owner of the goods or person incharge of the goods vehicle to make payment of tax and penalty subsequent to the objections filed, if any. Without providing such an opportunity, proceeding to pass confiscation order directly would not be construed as any mistake, defect or omission to come within the ambit of Section 160 of the CGST Act. It is a fundamental flaw whic....
TaxTMI