https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377703 The court quashed the confiscation order issued under the CGST Act, citing illegal detention of goods and vehicle, unilateral presumption by the respondent, and violation of prescribed procedures. It emphasized the necessity for the proper officer to pass a speaking order after considering objections and quantifying tax and penalty before confiscation. The court restored the penalty notice, directed the respondent to expedite consideration of objections, quantify tax and penalty, and release goods upon payment within seven days. The judgment aimed to rectify procedural errors and ensure compliance with statutory requirements in confiscation cases under the CGST Act. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377703 The court quashed the confiscation order issued under the CGST Act, citing illegal detention of goods and vehicle, unilateral presumption by the respondent, and violation of prescribed procedures. It emphasized the necessity for the proper officer to pass a speaking order after considering objections and quantifying tax and penalty before confiscation. The court restored the penalty notice, directed the respondent to expedite consideration of objections, quantify tax and penalty, and release goods upon payment within seven days. The judgment aimed to rectify procedural errors and ensure compliance with statutory requirements in confiscation cases under the CGST Act. Case-Laws GST Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377703