Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 1432

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts collected service charges along with service tax from their service recipients, but failed to pay the same to the Government within the prescribed time. They failed to file the statutory ST-3 returns as required under Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 7 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. 2.2 A Show Cause Notice was issued proposing to demand the short-paid service tax along with interest and also for imposing penalties. After due process of law, the Original Authority confirmed the demand of Rs. 4,79,080/- along with interest and imposed equal penalty under Section 78 of the Act. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence, this appeal. 3.1 On behalf of the appellant, Ld. Counsel Ms. Kanthai Visalaksh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2481-42482/2018 dated 18.09.2018 and M/s. Sri Kalki Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of G.S.T. & Central Excise, Chennai vide Final Order Nos. 42768-42769/2018 dated 23.10.2018. 3.4 It is submitted by her that apart from a bald allegation that the appellant has suppressed facts, the Department has not adduced any evidence to show that the appellant has committed any positive act of suppression with intention to evade payment of service tax. 4.1 Ld. AR Ms. T. Usha Devi appeared and argued the matter on behalf of the respondent. She submitted that this is a case wherein the appellant has collected the tax and has not paid the same to the Government. This is a clear case of suppression of facts. The appellant would not have paid up the amoun....