<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1432 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377411</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 while maintaining the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 77. The Tribunal found that the financial constraints faced by the appellant were a reasonable cause for the non-payment of service tax, leading to the decision to set aside the penalty under Section 78. The judgment was pronounced on 25.03.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=564577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1432 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377411</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, setting aside the penalty under Section 78 while maintaining the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 77. The Tribunal found that the financial constraints faced by the appellant were a reasonable cause for the non-payment of service tax, leading to the decision to set aside the penalty under Section 78. The judgment was pronounced on 25.03.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=377411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>