2019 (2) TMI 395
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....I 395 - KERALA HIGH COURT - TMI<br>KERALA HIGH COURT - HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 23-1-2019<br>RP. No. 5 of 2019 IN WP(C). 41721/2018 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>MR DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J. For The Petitioner : ADV. SRI. M. P. SHAMEEM AHAMED For The Respondents : GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES JUDGMENT The petitioner, a dealer in KVAT Act 2003, seeks the following reliefs:....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....disputed tax, rather than "the existing demand", which includes interest as well. According to him, it will suffice if the authorities strictly adhere to the proviso to Section 55(4) of the Act. 4. To avoid ambiguity about the quantum to be paid by the petitioner as the pre-deposit before the appellate authority, the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, informed the Court that the amoun....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI