<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 395 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374768</link>
    <description>The pre-deposit for maintaining a VAT appeal was clarified to be 20% of the disputed tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, not 20% of the entire demand including interest. After the quantification was accepted by the petitioner, the earlier stay condition was modified accordingly. The pre-deposit was fixed at the stated amount and permitted to be paid in six instalments, with the appeal to be disposed of expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=557133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 395 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374768</link>
      <description>The pre-deposit for maintaining a VAT appeal was clarified to be 20% of the disputed tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, not 20% of the entire demand including interest. After the quantification was accepted by the petitioner, the earlier stay condition was modified accordingly. The pre-deposit was fixed at the stated amount and permitted to be paid in six instalments, with the appeal to be disposed of expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>