Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 1473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessment under Section 143(3) was completed on 21.06.2012 at return income. During the examination of record, it was noticed that the assessee had declared total receipts of Rs. 18,91,17,934/-, however, as per ITS data, the total receipts were Rs. 19,42,22,978/-. Therefore, after recording reasons and taking approval from the Principal CIT-I Jaipur, notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') was issued on 31.03.2016. During the assessment proceedings, the assessee was asked to furnish explanation for difference of receipts. The assessee has furnished reply, but has not furnished any justification or explanation about Rs. 72,76,821/-. The assessee did not disclose the receipt as shown in 26AS statement. A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal as well as the CIT(A) have erred by not considering the difference amount of Rs. 72,76,821/- as undisclosed receipt of the assessee made by the assessing officer. The Tribunal has failed to consider the fact that the assessee has claimed deduction of service payable on Rs. 1,61,36,763/-. However, this amount was not paid to the Central Excise Department during the year under consideration and thus, the assessee has not claimed deduction of full amount in the profit and loss account. The Tribunal has failed to consider the fact that as per the service tax return the assessee has shown the receipt of Rs. 15,02,04,707/-. whereas as per the bill raised including the service tax the amount is Rs. 20,52,54,497/-. Thus, there is also a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amount in its account but the evidences were not produced. In view of the above observations, it was concluded by the AO that the appellant has not disclosed receipts to the tune of Rs. 72,76,821/-. (ii) It is noted from the from the reconciliation statement that gross receipts shown in service tax return and gross receipts shown in books of accounts are as under:   Amount for which invoices issued as per service tax return Amount received agaisnt service provided as per service tax return Total 1,8,62,42,673/- 15,02,04,707/- Less: credit note issued during the year 40,90,034/- - Add: credit note reversed during the year 69,65,295/- - Gross receipt shown in books of accounts & gross receipt shown in service tax return ....