https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374308 The High Court dismissed the appellant-revenue's appeal as no substantial question of law was found. The assessing officer's addition of undisclosed receipt was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. Discrepancies in receipts were attributed to differences in accounting treatment, leading to variations in declared income between income tax and service tax returns. The Tribunal considered the material on record and found no contradicting evidence, supporting the deletion of the addition. Ultimately, the lack of substantial legal questions resulted in the dismissal of the appeal by the High Court. en-us Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:20:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374308 The High Court dismissed the appellant-revenue's appeal as no substantial question of law was found. The assessing officer's addition of undisclosed receipt was deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. Discrepancies in receipts were attributed to differences in accounting treatment, leading to variations in declared income between income tax and service tax returns. The Tribunal considered the material on record and found no contradicting evidence, supporting the deletion of the addition. Ultimately, the lack of substantial legal questions resulted in the dismissal of the appeal by the High Court. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374308