Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 1109

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tly let out for lease to various parties. The lease agreement stipulated that payment of rent should be made to each co-owner equally and separately in the name of the lessor in accordance with their share. 2. The Department took the view that although the property is jointly owned by the co-owners, there is no specific separation or demarcation of the property amongst the co-owners; that service is provided by the co-owners in respect of the property jointly; that only when the co-owners joined as an association or as a team, it appears that the service provider would come into existence. Hence, co-owner would collectively constitute a single entity providing taxable service. Consequently, there arises a service tax liability of Rs. 14,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....€¢ Anil Shah Vs. C.S.T. - 2013 (31) S.T.R. 239 (Tri. - Ahmd.); • C.C.E., Nasik Vs. Deoram Vishrambhai Patel - 2015 (40) S.T.R. 1146 (Tri. - Mum.); • Anil Saini & Ors. Vs. C.C.E., Chandigarh - 2017 T.M.I. 101 CESTAT Chandigarh; • C.C.E., Allahabad Vs. Luxmi Chaurasia - 2017 (2) T.M.I. 105 CESTAT Allahabad; • K.D. Chowdhary Vs. C.S.T. - 2013 (32) S.T.R. 441 (Tri. - Ahmd.); • Manju Champaklal Bafna Vs. C.S.T. - 2013 (31) S.T.R. 511 (Tri. - Ahmd.); • Minaxi Ben Thakur Vs. C.S.T. - 2013 (31) S.T.R. 329 (Tri. - Ahmd.); • Bhavna R. Shah Vs. C.S.T. - 2013 (30) S.T.R. 462 (Tri. - Ahmd.). (iii) Appellant submits that separate collection of rent is the rel....