Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 1108

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te for the Appellant Shri. S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Bench : The appellant is aggrieved by the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. 2. Brief facts are that the appellants are engaged in providing Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services. On scrutiny of records, it was noticed that they had not discharged their service tax ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....terest much before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice. He relied on the decision in the case of C.C.E. & S.T., LTU, Bangalore Vs. M/s. Adecco Flexione Workforce Solutions Ltd. - 2012 (26) S.T.R 3 (Kar.) and prayed that the penalty may be waived. 4. Ld. AR Shri. S. Govindarajan appearing on behalf of the respondent supported the findings in the impugned Order. He submitted that the appellant ha....