Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 632

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....R. BASKARAN, AM This appeal filed by assessee is directed against the order dated30.11.2016 passed by the CIT(A)-41, Mumbai and it relates to A.Y. 2006-07. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of the CIT(A) in partially confirming the addition related to bogus purchases. 2. The assessee is a manufacturer of drugs and pharmaceuticals. The Revenue received information from the Sales Tax ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted that the assessee has manufactured drugs by using chemicals purchased from both the parties and have exported the same. Accordingly it was pointed out that there is no reason to doubt the genuineness of the purchases. The AO was not convinced with the explanation of the assessee. Accordingly he disallowed the entire amount of Rs. 70.34 lakhs and added the same to the total income of the assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....A.R. further submitted that the assessee has exported its goods and hence the goods could not have been manufactured with outusing material purchased from the impugned dealers. Accordingly the learned A.R. submitted that there is no reason to sustain the addition partially also. 5. On the contrary, the learned D.R. submitted that the assessee has failed to furnish any evidence to prove receipt ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... submitted that the profit element of 30% estimated by the CIT(A) is on the higher side and accordingly prayed that it may be reduced. She submitted that the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Simit P. Sheth 356 ITR 451 has sustained the addition to the extent of 12.5%. The learned D.R. submitted that 12.5% estimated by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court included profit element....