<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 632 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition related to bogus purchases to 15% of the purchase value. This decision was made due to the lack of evidence provided by the assessee and the necessity to estimate the profit element in the transactions. The Tribunal considered the absence of proper documentation, despite the assessee exporting materials, as a factor in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:34:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 632 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition related to bogus purchases to 15% of the purchase value. This decision was made due to the lack of evidence provided by the assessee and the necessity to estimate the profit element in the transactions. The Tribunal considered the absence of proper documentation, despite the assessee exporting materials, as a factor in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>